Story idPrefix not properly encapsulated

[FND]

The attached patch introduces two new functions, story.tiddlerId() and story.getTiddler(), which allow for properly encapsulating story tiddlers' ID prefix.

[FND]

For consistency with store.getTiddler(), the patch's story.getTiddlerElement() might be renamed to story.getTiddler().

MartinB:
No, patch is correct: tiddlers are in the store, tiddler elements are associated with hte story.

[SaqImtiaz]

I agree that using tiddlerElem would be easier to understand, but only if other functions were similarly renamed. We refer to tiddlers in the story as just tiddlers in all other Story functions, and therefore the function should be called story.getTiddler. Using the naming convention TiddlerElement? for just this function will introduce confusion.

Other functions in Story: Story.prototype.saveTiddler Story.prototype.refreshTiddler Story.prototype.closeTiddler

Therefore the attached patch should definitely be amended.

[MartinBudden]

On further consideration, Saq is correct. Patch should be amended - MB.

[FND]

Patch amended accordingly.

[JeremyRuston]

Fixed in changeset:3535

[FND]

cross-reference: This change has been superseded by #481.