Ticket Navigation

Ticket #335 (new enhancement)

Opened 1 year ago

Last modified 2 months ago

ignore blank lines around block items

Reported by:	FND	Assigned to:
Priority:	minor	Milestone:	3.0
Component:	core	Version:	2.1.03
Severity:	medium	Keywords:	formatting
Cc:

Description

In order to enhance readability of the tiddler source (wiki markup), it should be possible (though optional) to add blank lines around block items* without altering the formatted output.

* headings, lists, blockquotes, code blocks etc. - possibly individual list items as well

Change History

24/05/07 08:49:24 changed by FND

On a related note, it'd be useful if actual line breaks after <<br>> were "swallowed" as well.

For example, I often use lists like these:

* description<<br>>&rArr; conclusion

It would be much more readable if I could use

* description<<br>>
&rArr; conclusion

(without breaking the list into separate ULs (or worse, separate OLs)

28/05/07 10:50:01 changed by FND

A handy option would be to have a marker (e.g. "\\") to make TW ignore the following line break - e.g.

{{blockElement{foo}}}\\
bar

This would normally result in an additional line break (i.e. a blank line between the "foo" and "bar").

Not sure if this is easily possible though.

16/07/07 16:03:09 changed by MartinBudden

milestone set to 2.3.

12/10/07 17:18:53 changed by MartinBudden

milestone changed from 2.3 to soon.

22/10/07 13:28:16 changed by MartinBudden

milestone changed from soon to 2.3.

23/10/07 09:12:17 changed by FND

cross reference: This issue is closely related to #34.

29/11/07 16:39:46 changed by MartinBudden

milestone set to 2.3.1.

19/02/08 15:42:17 changed by MartinBudden

milestone changed from 2.3.1 to 2.4.

14/04/08 10:03:56 changed by MartinBudden

milestone changed from 2.4 to 2.5.

28/05/08 11:27:34 changed by MartinBudden

milestone changed from 2.5 to 3.0.

09/06/08 15:21:18 changed by FND

keywords set to formatting.

cross-reference: #449

22/06/08 20:17:22 changed by FND

cross-references: In addition to #34 and #449, this issue is closely related to #688.

Search

TiddlyWiki.org